Quality vs. Quantity: A Call Center ConundrumLearn Management Articles on management-info.biz. Quality vs. Quantity: A Call Center Conundrum article will help answer your questions on Management Articles.We at management-info.biz specialize in Management Articles. Management Articles at management-info.biz provides the most up to date news and articles. If you have questions please do not hesitate to contact us.
Representative Super Speedy says, 'I've taken more calls than anyone on the team today. My average handle time is the lowest on the floor.' Coach Level Head breaks it down for him, 'But your quality scores are below everyone else on your team.' Representative Detailed Dan says, 'My quality scores are top notch. I give every one of my customers the detailed attention they deserve.' Coach Level Head breaks it down again, 'Your Average Handle time is through the roof, and there are customers waiting in queue for attention to their needs. Where is the happy medium? True quality means being effective and efficient; meeting the customer's needs fully in a reasonable amount of time. As a call center supervisor in a Customer Service department I managed a team of 20 representatives. Like many teams there were 'top performers' or super stars, 'middle of the road performers' or most of the team and 'low performers' or the folks that needed help to the middle of the road. My goal was to work with everyone to bring them up to the next level and ensure quality and efficiency as a group. I remember one team member who fell into the low performer category. She was very detailed, very good with customers and her quality scores were outstanding. So, what put her in the low performer category? The amount of time she spent on each call. In one work day she would complete only half the number of calls completed by her team members. Her average handle time was off the charts. We had to work on this as soon as possible. I coached her on several occasions and we found ways for her to cut time off of her calls. She did more typing while she talked to the customer; she learned the system more thoroughly so she could offer the answers to the customer's billing questions. Still her efficiency was not there. So, we continued the coaching. Her argument was that her quality scores were so high that the quantity should not matter. She would receive 95% to 100% on each monitoring score. She was providing the customer with a quality interaction. They would go away feeling good about the company and the services they purchased. So, why did it matter if she took a long time talking with each customer? This discussion changed my explanation of quality and quantity forever. I explained to her (and everyone else, on every team I ever coached going forward) that Quantity is not a separate goal from Quality. Quantity is actually efficiency, and efficiency is part of Quality. Instead of focusing on the number of calls we took in a day, we must talk about this performance goal in terms of how efficiently we took those calls. Did we use the time we had with them appropriately? We can not say that we offered the customer a Quality Interaction if we kept them on the phone for 25 minutes trying to solve their issue. On each call we owe the customer courtesy, information, honesty, answers and EFFICIENCY. A customer who received the answer they called looking for in 3 to 4 minutes will be happier than one who reaches their answer after 10 minutes. In addition to the individual call, the time one representative spends on a call with one customer can also affect the perspective of the customer who is waiting in queue. I'm not suggesting that team members rush through calls to answer the next, but it is important to be aware of the impact of the time you spend on each call. The more efficient you are on each call, the more effective the department will be as a whole. We ensure the efficiency part of Quality by being prepared for each call. Preparation includes knowing the tools and systems we use to answer the customer's needs, being up to date on new products, services or issues the customers may be calling about, and having our best Customer Service attitude ready to talk to each customer. All this has become my Quality message. I have been known to pull up a soap box in the break room and spread this good word. Quality is built on quantity or efficiency. Offer clear, helpful, efficient customer interactions. My team learned it and improved in each one of their performance goals.
Let the Quality vs. Quantity battle end. Your customers will thank you. |
More Articles:1. Assertive Behaviour Recognises That Reality Is A Construction Of The Mind By M'Hamed Cherif Gentle assertiveness is founded on tolerance and respect for others. It entails the need for envisaging the possibility that others may have good reasons to see things differently. Truly assertive people are creative and accommodating, while aggressive people transgress the rights of others. Gentle assertive people assert their opinion, but they also recognise the importance of carefully listening to others. When confronted with assertive people, it is also important to remember that are good … 2. The “Better People” Fallacy By Arvind Kumar It’s easy enough to convince your own staff that better people will prevail, even against the odds. It’s what they want to hear. And surely in a marketing war quality is a factor as well as quantity.It is, but superiority of force is such an overwhelming advantage that it overcomes most quality differences.We have no doubt that the poorest team in the National Football League could consistently beat the best team in the NFL if it could field 12 men against the opposition’s 11.In business, wher… 3. A Leadership Screw Driver: The 90 Day Improvement Plan By Brent Filson I was talking with first-line supervisors in a utility company about how to deal with poor performing employees."You've gotta put the screws to him!" suggested one supervisor to his colleague who was having trouble managing one particular poor performer."I've put so many screws to him he's dead weight!" the supervisor replied.We all knew what "putting the screws to him" meant -- using rewards and punishments to force change in behavior.The trouble is, rewards and punishments are the least effe… 4. Rules for Running a Meeting By Ofer Tirosh As an experienced manager, I can announce without a doubt that the primary reason for lack of effectiveness in the contemporary business world is that people don’t follow the rules for running a meeting. Thousands meetings are conducted each day and most of the meeting chairmen have not even heard of the rules for running a meeting. Therefore, the following article includes a brief description of the basic rules for running a meeting.1. Planning – planning is probably the most important of th… |
||||
