Coaching Skills for Peers: Extending InfluenceLearn Management Articles on management-info.biz. Coaching Skills for Peers: Extending Influence article will help answer your questions on Management Articles.We at management-info.biz specialize in Management Articles. Management Articles at management-info.biz provides the most up to date news and articles. If you have questions please do not hesitate to contact us.
Peer coaching is not a new idea, but is not widely practiced. In fact, there are significant barriers to its effective use. In some organizations, the “command-and-control” style of management is so entrenched that position power seems to be the only lever available to get others to consider a request. More and more, though, organizations are flattening out, abandoning a rigid hierarchy, and encouraging people to come together across boundaries, divisions, and departments to unite efforts and talents in ways that may not have been possible before. Eliminating territorial attitudes and interdepartmental rivalries, and encouraging teamwork provides for endless possibilities. Peer coaching requires many of the same coaching skills that managers utilize when coaching Representatives. However, peer coaching also demands a special sensitivity to relative situations. For example, a manager may address an issue directly: “John, I need to get some numbers from you on the Simpson project.” With a peer, a less direct approach is needed. Peer coaching requires asking questions, gaining an understanding of the other person’s issues and viewpoints, and identifying areas of shared interest or concern. Peer coaching doesn’t necessarily involve quid pro quo – “I’ll do this, if you’ll do that.” But, peer coaching does involve identifying areas where one team member can be of assistance to another team member, or where the combined efforts of team members provide the most beneficial results. As with all coaching skills, the most important piece of peer coaching is listening to understand. Learning more about various priorities allows people to identify areas for collaboration, while strengthening relationships and seeing team members as valued individuals. A team member’s greatest untapped resource may be the opportunity to reach across boundaries, combine strengths, and achieve personal goals as well as the goals of the organization. Quick Tip
|
More Articles:1. Business Needs Vs. Network Performance: Critical Challenges Facing Network Managers By Amichai Lesser Networking is getting tougher. Networks must deliver a growing range of services, from ERP, CRM and email to VoIP and web services applications, each of which has its own idiosyncrasies and requirements. Each new service introduced onto the network contends for available resources with every other service, impacting the network’s ability to support the business.Meanwhile, the network itself is constantly changing. New locations are added – some of which may be in another country or on another … 2. Management Development - Micromanagement Works! Ever been told not to micromanage your people? Because it irritates them and is a waste of your time, their time and leads to bad habits? Well it's all true. If you micromanage your people in all that they do, it will drive you and them nuts. But there is a way that micromanaging brings huge benefits to your management performance. Getting into the detail of everything each of your people does, will really damage your relationships with them. Sure, there are times where their hand needs to be he… 3. Blame Culture Blues - How the Language of Blame Manifests Organisational Underperformance By Stuart Avery If you have ever worked within a large organisation then you are sure to have heard the term 'we will not have a blame culture' at some point. However the sheer fact that this statement can be made is an indication that a blame culture already exists.Where the statement 'don't think of the colour blue', immediately makes one think of blue, the 'no blame culture' statement is more likely to raise within the organisation the possibility of blame than remove it. In fact an organisation must know … 4. Problems with Group Decision Making By Andrew E. Schwartz DECISION BY AUTHORITY RULE: Many groups start out with—or quickly set up a power structure that makes it clear that the chairman (or someone else in authority) will make the ultimate decision. The group can generate ideas and hold free discussion, but at any time the chairman can say that, having heard the discussion, he or she has decided upon a given plan. Whether or not this method is effective depends a great deal upon whether the chairman is a sufficiently good listener to have culled t… |
||||
