Leadership For Deep Results: Without Them Are You Wasting Your Leadership And Your Life? (Part One)Learn Management Articles on management-info.biz. Leadership For Deep Results: Without Them Are You Wasting Your Leadership And Your Life? (Part One) article will help answer your questions on Management Articles.We at management-info.biz specialize in Management Articles. Management Articles at management-info.biz provides the most up to date news and articles. If you have questions please do not hesitate to contact us.
Word count: 580 Summary: The author asserts there are two kinds of results leaders achieve, standard results and deep results. All leaders know what standard results are, but few leaders know what deep results are. In the long run, standard results, though necessary, are far less important than deep results. Leadership For Deep Results: Without Them Are You Wasting Your Leadership And Your Life? (Part One) by Brent Filson I've challenged all leaders I have worked with during the past two decades to achieve 'more results faster continually.' They can get on track to start achieving such results not by working harder and longer but by slowing down and using Leadership Talks on a daily basis. However, I also tell them that getting on the more-results-faster-continually track is not an end but a beginning. They must then begin focusing not just on the quantity and speed of results but the kind of results they aim to achieve. There are roughly two kinds of results, standard results and deep results. Most leaders understand standard results but fail to come to grips with deep results. In fact, these leaders go through their entire careers getting the former, but they don't have a clue about the latter. Of course, standard results are necessary. But in the long run, they are far less important than deep results. We know what standard results are. They are the results we must get in our jobs, such as: speed, productivity, operations efficiencies, sales closes, sales leads, sales to new customers, failure prevention, health and safety advancements, quality, training, quality control, logistics efficiencies, marketing targets, new revenue streams, sales erosion, price calibrations, cost reductions, demand flow activities and technologies, inventory turns, cycle time reductions, materials and parts management, etc. Whereas achieving standard results enables us to do a better job and have a better career, deep results are different. Deep results are about being better leaders. Of course, being a better leader will have a positive impact on your job and your career. But there is something else involved: Being a better leader means being a better person. Who we are as a leader and who we are as a person should be the same thing. If they're not, we diminish both our leadership and the person we are. Look at it this way: Standard results are about 'doing'; deep results are about 'being'. Our most important achievements as leaders are not just what we achieve but who we become in that achieving. For instance, if we don't get standard results in our job, we fail in that job or at least in that particular aspect of the job. But in the realm of deep results, such failure might lead to success if in that failure, we find a better way to lead, a better way to be better. Here are some ways deep results differ from standard results. --Deep results emerge over longer periods of time. --Deep results encompass wider circles outside your job, usually impacting your family, friends, and relatives. --Deep results are often not conventionally successful results. They can come in the guise of failure. --Deep results can't be quantified. They're usually a quality of living or being. --Deep results are often not immediately apparent. Usually, you become aware of them after they appear and sometimes long after they appear. --Deep results are formed in your inner life and the choices you make over the things you control, your opinions, aspirations, and desires. --Deep results shape, and are shaped by, character. How does one go about getting deep results? There are many paths up this mountain. But one path is straight and steep and clear. In Part Two, I'll show you that path and provide examples of deep results in action. 2005 © The Filson Leadership Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
|
More Articles:1. Setting Goals and Implementing Change One of the most important aspects of management is implementing change and setting goals. Managers must decide what their goals are and how they are going to achieve them. This is a basic part of strategic planning. Setting small goals is a small part of the bigger picture in making your business or organization successful. Managers must decide what goals they believe will be most effective in improving their business and then decide how they are going to go about reaching those goals. Whatever… 2. Simple Mistakes You Simply Cannot Afford In Project Management! From the desk of: Arne Yri http://www.ProjectManagementMadeEasy.com Why should you care about my viewpoints? Good question - you don't know me - but obviously - You're confused and maybe even a bit fed up by your new assignment and it's lack of clarity... Typical problem! My specialty: Getting what I call 'sorry ass - stranded in the ditch - projects up'n running FAST! And by fast, I mean just that... Fast, or instant - in like 90 days or less... And in 6 to 7 months or less, depending on si… 3. Characteristics/Attributes of a Lean Operation By Joong Hyun Fundamentals in Place• There is a designated place for everything and everything is in its place. No time is wasted while looking for things. The organization looks clean and everyone is required, encouraged and motivated to keeping it organized.• The distance traveled by operator(s) and/or a specific part is less than the perimeter of the facility.• There are on-going reports easily assessable to everyone that provides timely feedback for individuals and groups.• Quality is achieved by cont… 4. How to Coach Your Emplyees and Increase Motivation By Andrew E. Schwartz It is easy to spot the difference between a work team that is “motivated” and one that just goes through the motions. The motivated team produces at or above the level expected by top management, has only occasional absences or tardiness, and low employee turnover. The second group has trouble meeting its goals, greater absenteeism, and higher turnover. In addition, members of the latter work team may be more apt to argue with one another or to band together against their supervisor. Can a sup… |
||||
