Leadership For Deep Results: Without Them Are You Wasting Your Leadership And Your Life? (Part One)Learn Management Articles on management-info.biz. Leadership For Deep Results: Without Them Are You Wasting Your Leadership And Your Life? (Part One) article will help answer your questions on Management Articles.We at management-info.biz specialize in Management Articles. Management Articles at management-info.biz provides the most up to date news and articles. If you have questions please do not hesitate to contact us.
Word count: 580 Summary: The author asserts there are two kinds of results leaders achieve, standard results and deep results. All leaders know what standard results are, but few leaders know what deep results are. In the long run, standard results, though necessary, are far less important than deep results. Leadership For Deep Results: Without Them Are You Wasting Your Leadership And Your Life? (Part One) by Brent Filson I've challenged all leaders I have worked with during the past two decades to achieve 'more results faster continually.' They can get on track to start achieving such results not by working harder and longer but by slowing down and using Leadership Talks on a daily basis. However, I also tell them that getting on the more-results-faster-continually track is not an end but a beginning. They must then begin focusing not just on the quantity and speed of results but the kind of results they aim to achieve. There are roughly two kinds of results, standard results and deep results. Most leaders understand standard results but fail to come to grips with deep results. In fact, these leaders go through their entire careers getting the former, but they don't have a clue about the latter. Of course, standard results are necessary. But in the long run, they are far less important than deep results. We know what standard results are. They are the results we must get in our jobs, such as: speed, productivity, operations efficiencies, sales closes, sales leads, sales to new customers, failure prevention, health and safety advancements, quality, training, quality control, logistics efficiencies, marketing targets, new revenue streams, sales erosion, price calibrations, cost reductions, demand flow activities and technologies, inventory turns, cycle time reductions, materials and parts management, etc. Whereas achieving standard results enables us to do a better job and have a better career, deep results are different. Deep results are about being better leaders. Of course, being a better leader will have a positive impact on your job and your career. But there is something else involved: Being a better leader means being a better person. Who we are as a leader and who we are as a person should be the same thing. If they're not, we diminish both our leadership and the person we are. Look at it this way: Standard results are about 'doing'; deep results are about 'being'. Our most important achievements as leaders are not just what we achieve but who we become in that achieving. For instance, if we don't get standard results in our job, we fail in that job or at least in that particular aspect of the job. But in the realm of deep results, such failure might lead to success if in that failure, we find a better way to lead, a better way to be better. Here are some ways deep results differ from standard results. --Deep results emerge over longer periods of time. --Deep results encompass wider circles outside your job, usually impacting your family, friends, and relatives. --Deep results are often not conventionally successful results. They can come in the guise of failure. --Deep results can't be quantified. They're usually a quality of living or being. --Deep results are often not immediately apparent. Usually, you become aware of them after they appear and sometimes long after they appear. --Deep results are formed in your inner life and the choices you make over the things you control, your opinions, aspirations, and desires. --Deep results shape, and are shaped by, character. How does one go about getting deep results? There are many paths up this mountain. But one path is straight and steep and clear. In Part Two, I'll show you that path and provide examples of deep results in action. 2005 © The Filson Leadership Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
|
More Articles:1. The "Leader's Fallacy" May Be Howard Dean's Undoing By Brent Filson Howard Dean's tenure as chairman of the Democratic National Committee will be fleeting unless he avoids a common leadership trap I call it, the "Leader's Fallacy".Leaders adhere to the Leader's Fallacy when they believe their enthusiasm for a particular leadership challenge is automatically reciprocated by the people they lead.However, in leadership, automatic reciprocity is an illusion. Just because you as a leader are motivated, doesn't mean that the people are motivated too. Howard Dean i… 2. People Reading in Real Time By Pat Wiklund We've heard the slogans: career success depends on developing relationships, establish rapport with your colleagues. And do it quickly! No longer is it enough to treat our co-workers the way we would like to be treated. Now we are being challenged to employ the Platinum Corollary to the Golden Rule: do unto others the way they would like to be done unto.But how can you do it? How do you quickly size up a new team member, or an internal customer, and then shape your approach to his s… 3. Partnering for Performance By Jenny Kerwin “The difference between a boss and a leader: a boss says, ‘Go!’ – a leader says, ‘Let’s go!’” -E. M. Kelly* Are you a boss or a leader?* Do your employees see you as part of the team or as looking over it?* How would your team members define your management style?I ask these questions as a challenge, and offer the opportunity to take a look at your manager/team member relationships.Merriam-Webster states that a boss is someone who exercises control or supervision; someone who dictates policies… 4. Hidden Consultants Within Your Organization By Harwell Thrasher You’ve all heard the old joke about a consultant being someone who uses your watch to tell you the time, and then steals your watch. There’s some truth to the story: consultant recommendations are often the same things that your employees or customers have been telling you all along. But while you will listen to a consultant, you don’t listen to your employees and customers. Why is that? Why do companies pay more attention to consultants then they do to employees or customers? And what should … |
||||
