Organizational Capital in Politics, War, Sports and Business



Learn Management Articles on management-info.biz. Organizational Capital in Politics, War, Sports and Business article will help answer your questions on Management Articles.We at management-info.biz specialize in Management Articles. Management Articles at management-info.biz provides the most up to date news and articles. If you have questions please do not hesitate to contact us.

Intangible Corporate Assets such as Organizational Capital, Blue Sky and Brand Name Capital, actually they all have a common thread in my opinion. Here are some thoughts on these issues. And first I would like to comment on a couple of UCLA, Anderson School of Business items which are of interest. And I must say these research pieces are somewhat cutting edge, in business management theory.

This is particularly interesting to me as one of my family tree offshoots was Friedrich Winslow Taylor, whose mom, Emily Winslow was an offshoot of the Winslow’s in the Philly area, which are my direct ancestors after they had moved from the Mass and Maine areas. Thus Freidrich Winslow Taylor had similar beliefs in organization which also I had nurtured into my upbringing and therefore find such items fascinating and apropos to running a nationwide service business like the Car Wash Guys http://www.carwashguys.com, which is my company.

Here are some thoughts of value to add to the comments and findings in these research projects of the UCLA Anderson School of Business. First item to be discussed is an article by Bhaqwan Chowdhry a Professor PhD (not to be automatically granted superior expert status as Einstein said-Pile higher and deeper comes to mind) although in this case the work is relevant and very good, so the PhD in this case has been noted as such social norms dictate. I thoroughly enjoyed Bhaqwan's research on Organizational Capital (OC). This is quite good.

http://www.anderson.ucla.edu/faculty/bhagw...dhry/orgcap.pdf

I think when teaching this concept to future executives, governmental leaders, non-profit leadership personal, coaches and military top brass that a few points of value might be added in summary, for instance: First and most basic is: "Bet on the Jockey not always the horse" might be looked at a little closer. Winners usually win and therefore bet on a winner. In a team atmosphere the best team can beat a team made up of superior single players with better skills. Bet on the team or jockey and not necessarily the horse or industry. Another comment might be "Chainsaw AL destroys OC", cutting organizational capital that it took time to build destroys rather than builds and we should be looking at companies such as Microsoft and Bill Gate’s theory of organizational and intellectual capital in this realm. When other companies cut back he continued supporting and advancing his team on new projects. Another point is that of competition during periods of OC flux of the opponent, whether it be generals of a hostile country, downsizing of military due to economic situations of your potential adversary and with that theories of Von Clauswitz on first strike and reciprocal response to serve your political will. Look at China and other countries forcing their hands at times of our military down sizing?

So this comment is worthy of note to add to the cliffs notes of such a research report on OC; "The best time to try new products or marketing techniques is when your rival competitors are going through transitions such as lay offs, large department cost cutting, mergers or changing of the guard due to retirements. Their OC is at an all time low as it is readjusting and cannot adapt to chase you into the newly opened market sector". OC is also exponential in many cases depending on it’s usage. Try this concept to be added to the debate on OC. "The longer a groups works together, the greater the chances of increased OC provided primate politics and innate human characteristics to not impede the flow of information and rapid transfer of communication". All these items and the OC of any company is critical when discussing flow of information for good decision making in a non-linear fashion. Here are some thoughts on flow, which will increase your ability to convey these concepts and this message to future leaders. I have always determined that the OC as is called in this report, which is appropriately named was far more important than the Physical Capital. For instance our company runs our entire business and operates in many states from this unit.

http://www.carwashguys.com/blitz.html

And with that said our physical capital besides the service vehicles is nearly unworthy of mention from a Balance Sheet perspective. But the rapid ability to adjust to new markets and take them is our strength as the game becomes faster and theories such as the Fast eat the Slow abound, I to am a firm believer and perfect case study for this most recent evolution in management theory and OC enlightenment. This research paper is correct in that regard for the building of teams. And I submit of further value for the new leadership, which will be taking over CA from Gray Davis. CA is a large state and needs a team akin to that of the White House team with top notched brilliant visionaries and people with incredible strength of character and passion. I would also submit that part of our problem in this country is it takes a while to get adjusted as a team to work smoothly, this president was lucky in that he was able to bring on many experts who had worked before under his fathers administration and had become ego-less in their many years of taking hard knocks of politics and media attacks in stride.

But as we are witnessing currently the country is dividing and the current population is divided about 55% - 45%. And the nine opposing candidates are blasting the team and the team is forced to defend itself instead of focusing maximum efforts on the future and strategic positioning of this great nation for the rapidly increasing rate at which we must deploy our efforts to stay at the top of the game. We can tell by the poles of the people and approval ratings that the country is divided on the means, but still believes in the ends. Keeping a team together means the time needs to allowed for the leadership to work together for the betterment of the American people, the more chaos is involved and the every four years attempts to change the guard is at issue, just as it would be in any company. As we watch the divisiveness of the Maryland Senator Sarbaines attack the Forbes gal appointed for the economic team in the white house you have to wonder what would happen if every company executive of GE, first had to have all the applicants reviewed and voted on by the competing companies before they could serve as a officer, middle manager, board member or janitor? See the problem, the opposition is trying to destroy appointments to the team and therefore threaten them and influence their future decisions on capital hill.

How can they then be able to do their best and use those skills to help us, the people, in the case of a Sports team the fans, in the case of the Military the people you are liberating, in the case of a company the customer, which is the reason that they are allowed to make money. How many levels of disruption should be allowed to build a strong team. In the government they are attacked as appointees, Supreme Ct, Secretaries, department heads and advisors to the leadership. Then they are attacked by frivolous lawsuits, then by the media, then again by the wannabe incoming politicians throwing stones who live the terrariums of glass, who are not even a half a step away of Hurricane Isabel? All this hurts a team. And since we are all on the same team, in that we are all Americans, why do we allow the flow of information, the recruiting of the best of the best and the guidance of the most qualified and passionate of those who serve to be attacked?

This does not pave the way for future communication on the team, which is suppose to serve free men. The people, damn it, you and I. At one point Sarbaines laid into the Mrs. Forbes for going to a benefit, $5,000 hot dog gig where the President would be along with all the leadership. She would soon be appointed to help on the economic committee, which we need the best and brightest. By attending such an event she could get a good feel of who she will be working with a noble cause indeed, what is wrong with that? Nothing and this liberal school we call UCLA even has a study on why this is the best. So we have an opposition party attacking a future team member who will be serving us, while they attack the Corporate world and cause 7 trillion to exit the market and slow the flow of returns of capital into markets which would allow me to grow our company and provide jobs? Meanwhile calling all businessmen evil, complain there are no jobs? What is going on here, there is an incredible lack of communication, ego games, politics as usual and you and I have to listen to these idiots grandstand while we are wondering how on Earth we are going to make our payments while we are laid off and why our insurance was cancelled and credit cancelled due to traffic tickets because the strapped state budgets are increasing fines and the number of tickets quota to be written per period to help out the budgets?

Excuse me but no one is communicating. The Liberals or the Conservatives, meanwhile we attack the team members destroy teams of doers for photo-ops and pay backs in politics. Obviously mother nature is pissed too after you saw what happened with Isabel in the Washington area. What is the difference between a company run by leaders and leaders who run a country, from an MBA standpoint, like a company? Or a team, or a military or a Bee Hive for that matter?

It is interesting to watch such research papers in modern management theory try to mathematically quantify it on paper. This is because of the publish or perish rules and modern academia standards of quantification of all theories even though the mathematics used to describe such theory will not work on a case by case basis, since there are too many factors and simple or even complex equations cannot adequately describe many simultaneous relationships of simplicity drawn out into complexity by the order of ever increasing magnitudes of Government Intervention, regulations, types of individuals, market regions, East-West, Mid East, etc civilization differences in hierarchy and culture. In that regard these simple observations cannot be rendered absolute and therefore much of the mathematics involved in these things are best guess at best, which is certainly not better than natural observations of the uninhibited and open mind in an out of the box viewpoint of the interactive dynamics of egos, pecking order, Machiavellian competitiveness and/or relationship building personalities.

You do not have to be on a team very long to under stand you need to stroke the egos of those who hog the ball. I believe that their is an exponential grouping not mentioned in that companies which divide and continue such a nurturing of new managers which operate in that realm, produce offshoots of other market sectors with the mentors of the previous whole for the individual divisions. Such as GE, 3M, Battelle, Fed EX, etc. I see this happening with our team (the company I run).

I believe that such an observation also servers well in coaching, military leadership, Presidential Administration and R and D non-profit efforts. As you probably have also looked at the benefits of such OC management theory for things like NASA, UN, NATO, etc. I grant Continued success to those PhD research people at the UCLA Anderson School of business and surely applaud those who walk the walk and are able to practice such theories in the real world and not only on the Meade Paper water mark, this research is definitely onto something big and it is correct and a good paper.

Each month I receive the Books of the month audio book summaries on tape of the best business books, each month one or more are about Organizational Psychology, Leadership, Management and you know what all the books are looking the same. I can tell you the old professor who comes every night and eats on the waterfront in George Town drunk off his ass may as well be running things if we cannot get our act together and get on the same page, because this infighting Beltway buzz BS is hurting America. It is not solving the problems we face, the team must be strong, every one who is elected or appointed to such capacities must be on the team. In it to win it. Darn it. Any comments of my observations are welcome in my efforts to beat the best efforts of the past period leaders in all sectors. Too many people are not studying the whole game out there.

Now then I would Also like to comment on another research project which is quite good. So with regards to Bart Bronnonberg's research on multi-branding of retail consumer goods. I must say I thoroughly enjoyed Bart's on the Multi-brand issues and having purchased Salsa at Wal-Mart last night and last week at an Albertson's, these thoughts went through my mind. And as I build my business across the country, I see things and think of such issues often. I enjoyed Bart's Bronnonberg's paper:

http://www.anderson.ucla.edu/faculty/bart..../sustain_v1.pdf

Having traveled to every city in the US over 10,000 population, I find it interesting that this paper comes to my similar conclusions, about these same topics and even goes further into quantifying mathematically the truths that we observe and the reasons behind the decisions. I therefore applaud Bart’s efforts as this is important information to any Entrepreneur. Also I have to wonder what Bart’s thoughts about the article in CFO Magazine about these manufactures amortizing the shelf space costs over 40 years as brand capital? If the product fails they keep the cost against the Brand Capital for the forty years even if the particular product is a dud, or that sub-brand did not take hold in the minds of consumers and the product was therefore cancelled. Estimated in one study I have read 60% of new products are duds and even the ones, which survive a small test market often when rolled out are mistakes. By separating out the shelf space costs to get at eye level of the consumer, and calling the product successful when it sells, maybe a way such a company can bring out more products faster and still retain operational profits to keep up stock valuations thus giving them the edge to go into new markets or cause greater market share in Duopolies where the other competitor does not use such creative accounting. Whereas there maybe good enough reason initially for such off P and L accounting techniques, once it starts when would it ever stop?

So then, I would like to know other people’s and Bart’s thoughts on this as well. And what are your thoughts with newer Web Based operations, which are run by large retailers for home delivery, the basic WebVan concept, but done by the grocery chains themselves? I was recently in Jacksonville, FL and Piggly Wigglies and Publix are both considering if they should ditch these efforts or continue while it takes hold. Safeway and Albertson’s as well as Bashams in AZ are also going after these niches. If these retailers continued the symbiotic relationships with Manufactures of let's say salsa, then the web listing space placement would be of significant value thus offsetting costs to consumers for delivery and thus the consumer wins from this symbiotic relationship. However, the accounting for such is at issue also as well as your thoughts and numbers and equations are called into question since the bidding for space would be more instantaneous and product testing faster. Has anyone considered these things yet?



Bookie Buster. - Discover The Tips & Tricks That Sportsbook Owners Are Hiding from You!
Starting A Child Daycare. - Complete business package to help you easily and quickly start your own profitable home-based day care business!

This is the next interview in the continuing series with world-renowned professionals. Gabriel shares his remarkable insights from one of the best in the world.

Dr. Gabriel SilbermanDr. Gabriel Silberman is Senior Vice President and Director of CA Labs. He is responsible for building CA Technologies research and innovation capacity across the business.

Leveraging the talents of the company's researchers and technical experts worldwide, CA Labs engages with leading-edge researchers in academia, professional associations, industry standards bodies, customers and partners to explore novel products and emerging technologies in support of CA Technologies key growth areas. The results of these collaborations vary from research publications, to best practices, to new directions for products. Research topics cover insider threat detection, identity management, root-cause analysis, software development architecture, cloud computing methodology and strategy, and the human factor in technology.

Gabby joined CA Technologies and established CA Labs in 2005. His experience in academic and industrial research has contributed to the success of the collaborative model of exploration into emerging and disruptive technologies.

Prior to joining CA Technologies, Gabby was program director for the IBM Centers for Advanced Studies (CAS), where he was responsible for developing and adapting the collaborative research model for IBM worldwide. Previously, Gabby was a manager and researcher at IBM's T.J. Watson Research Center where he led exploratory and development efforts, including work in the Deep Blue chess project.

Gabby began his career in academia as a faculty member in computer science at the Technion — Israel Institute of Technology. He was a visiting professor at Carnegie Mellon University, and serves on academic advisory boards at several universities and research institutes around the world. Gabby was a Council Member-at-Large of the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) and serves on editorial boards as well as conference organizing and technical program committees. He is also a member of the International Federation of Information Processing Working Group 10.3 and a senior member of the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers Computer Society.

Gabby earned Bachelor of Science and Master of Science degrees in Computer Science from the Technion – Israel Institute of Technology and a Ph.D. in Computer Science from the State University of New York at Buffalo.

Publications and Conferences

To listen to the interview, click on this MP3 file link

DISCUSSION:

Interview Time Index (MM:SS) and Topic

:00:21:
Gabriel, you have a strong history of significant global impact in research, innovation, and senior executive leadership. Thank you for sharing your considerable expertise, deep accumulated insights and wisdom with our audience.
"....Thank you Stephen. I look forward to your questions...."

:00:34:
Define the ACM DSP and your role?
"....The Distinguished Speaker Program (DSP) and its predecessor the Distinguished Lectureship Program (DLP) were created primarily to serve ACM student chapters by bringing outstanding professionals to their schools and giving talks on topics of interest in the computing profession. A couple of years ago we noticed that the DLP were underutilized. A committee was formed by ACM to look into ways to revitalize the program and thus the birth of the DSP. I was part of the committee that looked at ways of actualizing the program and I am currently chairing that committee which is composed of colleagues from academia and industry as well as government....Our aim is to have ACM in general and DSP in particular as a resource to serve the broader public...."

:03:19:
What is the value of the DSP and which audiences can benefit from the DSP? Can you expand on this?
"....The main purpose of the DSP is to bring together speakers and topics that are current, but also people who can give their perspectives on (for example, computing careers) to help students decide which way to take their career....The advantage of going through the DSP is not just the quality of the speakers that you can tap into, but also the funding model that ACM uses for the DSP...."

:05:31:
What is your vision for the DSP and how will you close the gaps in your DSP roadmap from current status to future vision?
"....One of my main objectives as Chair of the DSP committee is to make it more international, both in terms of recruiting top-flight professionals as speakers in other geographies and also by creating demand for those programs in other geographies. Some of the approaches that we've taken are to reach out to national computing societies, as well as working with several of ACM's other organizations and bodies that have a presence in other geographies like Europe, China and India to recruit more speakers and to promote the program to local hosts....Another option that we're looking at is to link the DSP to other ACM services...."

:07:18:
How can audiences further engage with the DSP?
"....We have two audiences for the DSP. One is distinguished speakers and we invite them to apply or self-nominate, or they can be nominated by another professional to become speakers in the DSP program. The other audience are the hosts that will invite the speakers....To date we have about 100 speakers, many of them with multiple lectures so we have quite a good selection available....For more information for speakers and hosts: dsp.acm.org...."

:10:23:
What do you want to do with MITACS (Mathematics of Information Technology and Complex Systems) research network and can you get into more detail about what that means?
"....MITACS (Mathematics of Information Technology and Complex Systems) is a network that was created in Canada several years ago to promote just that — Information Technology and Mathematics and Complex Systems....It has possibly the largest reach of any non-governmental organization that I can think of in Canada into the universities and can open up a lot of possibilities in terms of awareness and news of the DSP. We reached out to MITACS to partner as a vehicle for delivering the DSP talks to the Canadian audience and in particular the university audiences, but also conferences and possibly industry opportunities...."

:12:36:
Gabriel profiles his extensive research history and shares valuable lessons from each of his top research areas.
"....I tend to switch gears every three to five years at the most, not necessarily switch jobs, but move from one area to another. To me it's very satisfying and exciting to learn new things and apply some of the knowledge that I've acquired through working in one area and possibly others....If I were to summarize the experiences that I've gathered along the way: first of all this possible translation of knowledge from one area to another and its use in it....From the Deep Blue matches — the most important lesson I learned were in human nature and the nature of competitiveness in a very intense field such as chess. More generally in terms of my acquisition of knowledge the keys to it were to ask the right questions, put together a self-motivated team that had diverse perspectives and enable them. Getting the team the resources that it needs to deliver on its mission is probably the key factor to success...."

:21:39:
Gabriel, you talked about your work at IBM; are there any additional insights you want to talk about in terms of your most difficult challenges, and the valuable lessons you wish to share from those challenges?
"....When you do research in an industrial environment the Holy Grail is to transfer technology from the work that you do in the research context and to find use in products or services or to contribute to improve some other processes that are used — whether it's to design hardware or develop software. As a researcher you have to have partners within those other parts of the enterprise that are your natural research recipients (who will eventually benefit from the work you do as a researcher). What I found over time is that you cannot do the research in isolation and then expect the recipient to trust what you’ve done is what they need....When you are doing this in collaboration and constant communication there's a much better chance of technology finding its way into a product...."

:25:56:
How did your time in Academia shape your current perspective?
"....I think it gave me a better understanding for the motivation and reward system that exists in academia and therefore it shaped the kind of agreements that I try to work on vis-a-vis universities. The biggest motivation for faculty is to find interesting problems to work on because that could open new areas for them for research giving ideas on thesis topics for the students and otherwise open opportunities for publication....The one thing that being in academia sort of highlighted for me is the role that students play in this equation both in terms of probably being the highest motivated individuals that you can run into....and they get a lot of value from working with industry at that stage of their careers...."

:29:21:
Prior to your time at CA, what were your most significant contributions in research management and what leadership insights can you share?
"....Deep Blue, the chess project….I was not part of the team that developed the actual chess machine; we helped in many of the surrounding issues. That probably gave me the best perspective on systems research....The second significant contribution had to do with this high bandwidth architecture that I mentioned earlier....Although it yielded some interesting insights its biggest value in my mind was as a thought leadership feat....My greatest satisfaction is the refinement of the collaborative research model that was started up in Toronto by the Centers of Advanced Studies at the IBM lab there several years prior to me joining the organization, I realize was such a compelling value proposition that upon finishing my assignment in Toronto after 3 years of leading the Centers of Advanced Studies there, I proposed to IBM to expand the Centers to other IBM locations...."

:34:47:
Can you get into more detail about the hurdles that you needed to overcome when setting up CA Labs?
"....When you come into a company that doesn't have a tradition of research you have to change the perspective. You have to develop the kind of trust that I was alluding to earlier in terms of bringing people on board early in the process, asking for their input and feedback on what you are trying to do explaining what is possible....The biggest challenge is to fight the quarter-by-quarter pressures of the business, and that is common not just in CA but in other companies that have a culture of research. Overcoming that kind of pressure by showing long-term possible benefits is always a challenge...."

:36:59:
How will you accomplish your top goals in your current position and how will you measure success for each of these goals?
"....First and foremost you need an outstanding team....The members of CA Labs are actually distributed around the world and in closest proximity to some of our large development teams....Another feature that we've developed within CA Labs over the last couple of years is tapping external funding for research in several countries....We also put in place a number of innovation programs to encourage more people to come up with good ideas....Another objective is to transfer technology both internally and externally....The work we have done with customers has been extremely enlightening. It gives you another perspective on what can be achieved from research...."

:41:21:
In your current managed research, what are your top challenges and top opportunities? How will the challenges be solved and the opportunities be actioned?
"....There is one challenge that divides into three for me and it's how dynamic our field is....Challenge 1 would be the continuous shift of the market. The second challenge is not unrelated to the shift of the market. It is CA's interests. CA is an extremely dynamic company. We adjust to the market by grouping products in a different way, by organizing ourselves and our go-to-market strategy a little bit different, basically on an on-going basis....The third which again is not unrelated to the other two is personnel moves....As far as the opportunities....Our participation in the definition of our corporate strategy process....We've created this process that uses the social media to gather that information from hundreds of contributors internally and synthesizing that into what we call the "world view". which includes everything from economic considerations and demographics, healthcare issues, the emerging markets and credit crisis, etc...."

:47:41:
Describe a few areas of controversy or much discussion in the areas that you research.
"....There's a lot of research being done on social networks both in terms of their impact, but also in the way that they can be manipulated....Cloud is another because it offers extreme benefits, especially lowering the threshold for smaller companies to access high quality and large capacity computing resources. There's lots of issues that come with the Cloud computing model, not the least of them have to do with legal issues....The third topic may surprise you but it's mainframes....Mainframes are not going away. The generation of programmers and administrators that were familiar with the mainframe are quickly approaching retirement age. So the question is, how do you staff all these installations that use the mainframes with highly skilled people?...."

:52:05:
"International Case Competition on the Strategic Value of IT Management" Can you describe what that is? Why this matters? How does the ACM fit in?
"....There are many that are international in flavor and are sponsored either by universities or companies but none of these really look specifically at the juncture of business and IT....So we decided to create a competition....This competition is all about giving Masters students (whether it's Information Systems, Business Administration or Computer Science) an opportunity to look at what they could be facing when they join workforce. IT in general is seen as the cost of doing business. We want to shift the conversation from cost to value....How does ACM fit in?....They really don't have the equivalent kind of opportunity for students who are focused more on the business side of IT. My hope would be that the ACM would consider participating in some way in this Case competition...."

:56:17:
How would you quantify the value of serving on academic advisory boards at several universities and research institutes around the world?
"....In general, industry is focused on shorter term issues and on specific skills of the technology of the day, whereas universities are more focused on a foundation of education and the ability of students to adapt over time and learn as technologies evolve....These two things are sometimes in tension, but through this dialogue I have found that it is profitable for both sides to see a shift in the education model or in the way education is delivered, but also the kind of topics that are being taught to better match the expectations of an employer when the student graduates and goes into the workforce...."

:58:41:
Can you share some of your top useful experiences as a Council Member-at-Large of the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) and also serving on editorial boards, as well as conference organizing and technical program committees?
"....A lot of what gets done in terms of conferences and publications and other events that further the profession and gives us a "seat at the table" when important things are being discussed is leveraging a professional association by its members. There's no other way to do the work....All these roles that you mentioned, being part of Council, serving on editorial board, helping organize conferences and serving on technical program committees they all fit under this broad category of service to the profession and giving back. Whenever I go and talk to students I stress the importance of being part of a profession and contributing...."

:01:02:03:
What are the key outcomes from being a member of the International Federation of Information Processing Working Group 10.3, and as a senior member of the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers Computer Society?
"....I would equate IEEE Computer Society to the experience with ACM. It's a professional association, most of its members are still US-based although things are changing particularly with ACM....IFIP is a little bit different. It is more international in flavor, has membership from many countries....That again is a more diverse group of people that bring different perspectives to the table...."

:01:03:41:
Why should practitioners, researchers, academics, executives, people from government and various domains join non-profit associations?
"....In general, there is the professional side and there's the human side of things. On the professional side I think it is your duty as a professional to enable others to have access to the benefits of the profession....On the human side of the equation there are things that happen in our society that should not. But we cannot expect our government to take care and fix everything that is wrong with the world. A lot of it depends on individuals identifying issues that they care about and when they do it's really to participate in their solution...."

:01:05:21:
What specific technologies should IT practitioners embrace today and into the future?
"....It's hard to predict the future, it's much easier to make it....One of the strong trends that we see today is what we refer to as the "consumerization of IT"....Not too different from that is the issue of "mobility"....I think that's a very strong trend that we're going to see developing over the next couple of years....I think that from a technology point of view both in terms of hardware and software solutions, focusing on Green IT will be important over the next few years...."

:01:10:07:
What specific technologies should businesses embrace today and in the future? Is it the same as in the previous question where I asked how it pertained to IT practioners?
"....I think there is a large overlap between the two questions. But if I were starting a business today I would really focus on using the Cloud as a platform to deliver whatever products and services I was developing. If I was an existing business with lots of legacy I would look at ways to adapt the products and services to the Cloud...."

:01:11:50:
Earlier I mentioned predicting the future. If you had no boundaries in terms of that question what would be your predictions and also their implications, and how we can best prepare?
"....Almost every business today is now about information and you have to understand how that information affects your business....What I think is the Holy Grail in the software side but also in the hardware side is reuse. The reuse of your efforts, planning, designing, and executing for reuse is extremely important....Sharing of knowledge, sharing of insight and sharing the product of your effort — when you do that you create a better more nimble organization that is able to deliver better and faster. That to me is the way to best prepare for the future...."

:01:13:50:
What are your thoughts on computing as a recognized profession like medicine and law, with demonstrated professional development, adherence to a code of ethics, and recognized credentials?
[See www.ipthree.org and the Global Industry Council, http://www.ipthree.org/about-ip3/global-advisory-council]
"....I think we are still a bit away from reaching the status of medicine and law....Almost every other profession has an information or computing component that requires professionals to take part in and therefore the demand for people in the computing profession is still strong. Employers will just take what's available and if necessary train to give them the skills that are necessary to perform within their environment. As long as we don't see the employers really get behind this initiative I think it will be very hard to get to the point where each computing professional has to be part of an association or some other body that gives them credentials...."

:01:15:42:
Gabriel shares three stories from his extensive travels and work. (something surprising, humorous, amazing).

:01:22:02:
If you were conducting this interview, what questions would you ask, and then what would be your answers?
"....People ask me....Why should someone get a PhD?....Assuming one has their PhD, should one take a career in industry or academia?....How do you pick your next job?...."



Article Index: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81


More Articles:


1. Business Fails When We Do Not Talk By Fernando Soave
You may remember being told as a child, "Keep quiet!" "Children should be seen, not heard," and "You talk too much." You were a "good" kid if you kept quiet. However, being quiet when you are little causes big problems later in life.As an adult, you may have been punished for communicating. For example, if you admit you committed a crime and are sorry about it, no one cares. You still go to jail. If you honestly tell your spouse you are thinking about an affair, your marriage suffers if your s…
Salads

2. Appraisal Interviews: What To Say & How To Say It By Andrew E. Schwartz
STEPS TOWARDS A GOOD APPRAISAL INTERVIEW:Don’t say: “You just don’t seem to care about doing a good job.” “You seem to be more interested in scoring points against Charlie than in working with him.” “You’re too defensive.” Do: Stick to behavior. say, “Here’s what I saw,” or, “Here’s what I heard you say.”Here is some advice for supervisors that will contribute to a successful appraisal interview. 1. Stick to goals. Measure performance against previously discussed and agreed upon goals. 2. Do n…

3. Tales from the Corporate Frontlines: Providing Career Opportunity By Josh Greenberg
This article relates to the Career Opportunity competency, commonly evaluated in employee satisfaction surveys. It explores issues such as internal growth opportunities, potential for advancement, career development importance, and the relationship between job performance and career advancement. It examines whether your employees believe they have a chance to grow within the organization. Studies show that lack of career opportunity is one of the top reasons why employees leave an organization…

4. Middle Managers Behaving Badly – How To Stop This Damaging Your Results By Bill Robb
More and more I hear and read about a looming crisis of leadership at the middle management level and the inevitable resulting increase in, poor performance, accidents and production mistakes and hence declining profits.I’m afraid to say these observations are not just rumours. In my own work as a management consultant I’ve noticed a distinct increase in negative behaviours in many middle managers in all sorts of companies.In this short article I’ll explain what I mean by “negative behaviours”…