A Blindingly Stupid Example of Change ManagementLearn Management Articles on management-info.biz. A Blindingly Stupid Example of Change Management article will help answer your questions on Management Articles.We at management-info.biz specialize in Management Articles. Management Articles at management-info.biz provides the most up to date news and articles. If you have questions please do not hesitate to contact us.
After a few weeks of service with the added engines, the airline president asked his Operations Manager if his airplanes were flying faster. The president was surprised to hear that, in fact, they were flying slower ... and that the number of oil-related engine failures on the old engines was up dramatically. The action-oriented, hands-on president decided to investigate first hand and sat in the jump seat as one of his crews got ready for a routine flight. The copilot meticulously read the checklist, and the pilot systematically complied. CoPilot: 'Start engines 1 and 2,' and the Pilot responded, 'Engines 1 and 2 started.' The pilots then proceeded to make the flight with two engines running and two engines not in use. After landing, the president asked the pilots if they were aware of the extra two engines. They were quick to respond: 'Are you kidding, of course we are aware! Dragging those things around costs us an extra 15 minutes of time and 3,000 pounds of fuel on that last leg alone!!' 'Then why don't you start them and use them?' asks the bewildered president. 'Hellooo,' says the pilot. 'Are you kidding? Our union contract specifically states that we fly two-engine aircraft!!' The president retreated from the cockpit and deplaned to watch the fuel and oil crew do the turn-around of the aircraft for the next flight. He was surprised to watch an obviously confused maintenance man scurry back and forth between the four engines...providing haphazard at best oil level checking and filling. After the plane backed away from the gate, the president approached the maintenance man to ask him what was going on. The maintenance man responded, 'Beats the heck out of me! I'm supposed to be checking oil on two engines before each flight, but I obviously have four to check now...and not enough time or help to get it done before the pilot starts the engines. Besides, I'm still trying to figure out why two of the engines never need any oil and the other two are too hot to approach to put any in!' The Director of Operations looks up from his desk to see the president storming into the office: 'How's it going, boss?' 'Poorly, thanks to you! What have you been doing for the last six months while we were getting the extra engines put on those airplanes!?' 'I've been running the day-to-day operations of this airline! What do you think I've been doing?' replies the DO. The president is ready. 'I know and expect you to be doing that! That's your job! What I'm talking about is what you have been doing - or not doing in this case - to get your flight and maintenance crews to fly airplanes with four engines?' 'I thought that was Charlie's job...he was the Project Manager on the Engine Project,' says the DO. 'Not so,' says the President. 'His job was to work with Boeing and get the engines on and running, and from what I see, he did just that. It was never his job to get the crews ready; they report to you, not to him. It was your job to foresee the union contract problem. It was your job to re-write flight checklists to four engines! It was your job to ensure we had a revised maintenance procedure and extra maintenance people!' And the dialog continues... Our goal in presenting this scenario is not to insult anybody with our blindingly stupid example, but this airline clearly needs an industrial strength dose of Change Management! Clearly the problem has nothing to do with Boeing...their engines work! The technology is there and working (the two new engines), but the manager of the flight crews and maintenance crews has clearly failed in his responsibility to get them ready to work with that technology. And his failure to get them ready is already producing very poor results...slow flights, wasted fuel, and increased engine failures. Without proper Change Management owned and provided by the user organization's leadership, many IT system implementations wind up in similar shape! The technology works 'technically,' but the organization is not ready to use it to get their work done effectively and efficiently.
Failure to ready the user organizations will result in decreased organizational performance and severely decreased employee morale. The goal of Change Management is to keep the organization from looking back some months after implementation and mumbling that what we did was 'blindingly stupid!' |
More Articles:1. Creativity and Innovation Directors, Consultants and Managers By Kal Bishop Creativity and Innovation is essential for competitive advantage, yet the role of Creativity and Innovation Manager is often not viewed as essential. Organizations without such a role will simply not perform as competitively as their rivals.People within and outside of an organization see problems all the time, but rarely are those problems dealt with in time. Tangible negative movements usually force change – shortcomings in expected growth, a fall in share price etc.Some of the requirements … Forestry sawmills 2. Effective Transition From Employee to Leader By Kreg Enderson Changing roles from employee to leader can be fun and very rewarding. It usually brings about more pay, more responsibility, and prestige. But it can also bring about some potential pitfalls as well. Here are 3 areas you can anticipate in advance as potential problems.First of all, many of us jump into our new role and never really know what is expected of us. We find out as time goes on just what we are not doing, typically from tough feedback from our manager. Take some time and study y… 3. Software 2005 The Software 2005 conference is now a wrap. This conference, presented by M.R. Rangaswami and The Sandhill Group, is now an annual event and attendance increased 35% this year over 2004. It is an ideal opportunity for those in the enterprise software industry to see what's new and what's coming, as well as to catch up with old colleagues and make new connections. It is also a perfect forum for startups to gain exposure as well as solicit funding and key partnerships.According to Sandhill, there… 4. Contract Management Software: the Solution to the Problem of Coordination By Joe Miller Charles Petrie, from Stanford, released a short article entitled “The Problem of Coordination,” which highlights 4 categories in which businesses find it difficult to connect:InteroperabilityAgent Communication Semantic Unification CoordinationThough this article refers to a specific type of business, its principles are just as applicable to any business, especially when collaborating on a contract. Contract collaboration and management is difficult in any business, and the negotiations can g… |
||||
